Bioelectric Fields: A Paradigm Shift In Biology | Prof. Michael Levin
What we call, ‘reality’, is not as we think it is…
Hearing Stephen Wolfram in conversation is a gift to lifelong exploration and discovery. There are several other talks available. This one is coalesces everyday questions with some of the discrete ideas that would need to be explored for more fundamental understanding.
One theme that he traces here is the role of human perception in shaping the ‘reality’ that we assume to be ‘objective’, ie, supposed to be independent of human perception:
“One of the important realisations (in) thinking about … foundations of science…in the end, what 29:04 matters is how we perceive things. What’s actually out there in the universe – the ruliad, doing all its complicated stuff. That’s all sort of irrelevant. What’s relevant is what a mind like ours perceives in the ruliad…He continues: In this ruliad object, this ‘entangled limit of all possible computations, observers like us inevitably observe the 30:12 laws of physics that we know to be the laws of physics. If we were not observers like us, we would not observe these laws of physics. “
This is a more open, nuanced and more helpful starting point, than starting from a more common attitude that says something like, ” we already know what the laws of physics are and whatever doesn’t conform to our current view is nonsense . Scientists like Stephen Wolfram, who also engage with practical questions, mark changes in how science is being conceived. This is why I have chosen to share this link.
From the video information, here is a breakdown of the CHAPTERS:
Composition of Matter 27:18
– Nature of Reality 39:35
– Exploring the Soul 42:10
– The Possibility of Aliens 49:29
– Consciousness vs Internal Experience 51:11
– The Secrets of Biological Evolution 56:13
– Expanding Human Perception 58:33
– Does the Body Have Its Own Language? 01:09:20
– How Reductionist Science is Limiting Medicine 01:31:15
– Arrival: A Discussion 01:32:53 – ARRIVAL Film: Behind-the-Scenes 02:03:13
– Would an Alien Mind Function Like AI?
When nature speaks, listen.
This is a wonderful talk that resonates with inner awareness and allows many subtle threads to enter conscious realisation.
I am reminded that when I was around 14 or 15, our biology teacher set us an experiment of talking to plants and to see how this affects their growth.
We used punnets of mustard cress. We placed them in different locations throughout our large laboratory classroom. They were all placed along the worktops by the window wall for equal access to the light source.
We carefully measured their water intake to make sure that it was equal.
To one, we spoke lovingly. To another, we spoke horribly. And, to the 3rd group, the ‘control’ group, we didn’t speak at all.
In our results, those we spoke to well, grew the most; those we spoke to horribly grew the least, and the measurement of the ‘control’ plants was ‘between’ the best and worst. So, in later years when the press was ridiculing Prince Charles for talking to his plants, it never occurred to me to wonder about the sense of his actions. In a quiet way, I knew what I knew, having been involved in the experiment and seen the results for myself.
This has probably been a discreet influence on my attitude to science and the question of an authentic basis for what we think we know. Experience indicates that what tends to fall short are beliefs based on our reaction to the attitudes and opinions of others, rather than what we have wondered about and explored for ourselves. So often, in the absence of our own involvement, ie testing out and seeing what happens, we become caught up in placing intense emphasis on conclusions and interpretations whose nature and implications we actually neither know or understand, and may not actually even care about.
While it is a valuable faculty/function, what we think of as the intellect is often misinformed and dominated, deformed by received opinions, rather than based on the convergence of genuine streams of awareness. Experience indicates that it is the friction of such contra-diction of this quieter knowing/being that gives rise to suffering. Suffering functions as a real time signal indicating that something vital is being misrecognised – ie, our beliefs are out of alignment with the real nature of our being.
It was many years later before I realised that the timing of her setting us the task of the experiment probably followed her reading of The Secret Life of Plants, published at that time (1973).
- This book is referred to as pseudoscience in the AI response to a search; pseudos as in lying! The question of who is lying about what sends our intellect into spirals of confusion when we have blocked ourselves off from our own enquiry. Our inner knowing awaits our attune to it again. It may be quiet or speak loudly, with symptoms and turmoil. Many, if not most of us, currently have some work to do to bring our conscious attitudes closer to resonance with our profound/intimate being/truth. This work is not strenuous, and not only can strain not accomplish it, strain goes in an opposing direction. We only have to begin by giving our consent (as an embodied feeling of being) in a present moment of its calling to us., of easing up on tension and, step by step, transformation begins happening.
The talk in the link above conveys a feeling of the way as well as bringing many relevant ideas into play.
What is non-locality? How is it relevant in our everyday life?
Stephan R Schwartz – for intelligent, rigorous discussion of key themes, oriented by exploration and experience. Here, he explores similarities and distinctions between scientific and religious beliefs/practices.
What is experience? What is Real? What is Reality?
It is not an interest or fascination with the strangeness of phenomena that prompts me to share this. It is to indicate that what is naturally within human experience is miscategorised as excluded from it. As I see it, we have an imminent need to allow the extension of capacity to handle ourselves well in the diversity of what life presents. This implies becoming increasingly able to discern and to work creatively with its truth. This is not something to do that is difficult; it is something whose ways of becoming can naturally unfold as we give our intimate consent.
Polarity and Contrast
“In the absence of that which you are not, that which you are is not”
Exploring Our Realities: The Intersection of Infinity and Human Experience
How do we, each one, interface and participate with infinity in the creation and rendering of our experience of our reality in its myriad forms?
How do we begin to think about the dissonances that give rise to unfathomable suffering with sufficient openness to allow its constitutive voices to speak, to articulate, to name their instances, to be heard, and further to be read by the living intelligence that strives to recognise and assume its quilting points in the embodied dimensions of perceived ‘reality’?
This material offers a context that allows living intelligence to breathe in its endeavours to discern viable terms of reference for exploration of self and other; to find a viable starting point – not once and for all,more a manner of speaking each time that and inspiration urges towards saying or movement.
The material is presented very well, both visually and in the eloquence of its narrative, offering a viable platform for considering issues that may seem intractable and nonsensical when approached via more simplistic or restrictive assumptions.
Sadhguru meditation – How To Be Silent Your Mind And Calm Your Energy YouTube
Watch “Quantum Gravity and the Hardest Problem in Physics | Space Time” on YouTube
Confused?
Here are some basic elements for approaching general understanding of experience.
More to follow as they arise.
Exploration and Discovery; Life and Mind
Our experience is made possible within a perceptual framework
Sequences of revelations in each of our unfolding journeys through experience carve a perspective – a refractive prism, that is, in its nature, unique.
It is worth considering that daily life (via attention and focus) includes, within ordinary human capability, the scope to navigate toward preferable states of being.
- In early life, a chorus of domineering assertions with tendencies towards recrimination and being on the bitter side demanded attention. In the event, their relentless predictions of doom made themselves heard within the array of data with which any human is saturated. These predictions took on a higher power when, on the side of ‘reality, their unhappy story of life in disappointment seemed to be confirmed by the unfolding of life circumstances, particularly for others more beloved.
- Being drilled with such messages, and then witnessing events that seem to corroborate them, gives form to fears that they may, against all that one could wish for, be right. or actually laid claim being true; truth was never mentioned. Their claim was, intrinsically, to being right, a form of ‘rightness’ that reaches for the baton of command and control.
- Bitterness becomes enshrined as a doctrine; an unholy scientism feeding on the trappings of what is asserted as the inevitability of failure.
When one is young, one often have to defend one’s desire (to oneself) against the impression that it is untested. It (desire, preference) can stand – seemingly alone – almost drowned in the vast sea of greater experience and authority claimed by elders.
What is surprising now, in retrospect, is that all the various approaches to liberation from this imposing doctrine of bitterness that I have been interested in so far ‘actually work’, in the sense that with very little in the way of effort, external conditions improve as well as there being an improved sense of personal ease and wellbeing. Eg, with easing of our perspective and thinking on a subject, be this through a meditative practice, a relaxed prayer in grace (not in begging need), an invocation of higher mind towards a liberating aim, external conditions change along with the reduced internal strain. Problematic situations begin turning around, persecutors ease up and new opportunities for creative endeavour burgeon.
These assertions can be tested – one by one for evidence of their validity, such as incremental, relative movement towards wherever, however, whatever one wants to be, feel, have, or do.
What remains is the re-conditioning of one’s habits of reasoning based on the coherence of fresh ideas of how life, material and mental, actually unfolds beyond what current norms (scientisms) may say. Scientisms to the extent that they are untested. What we call science takes on the burden of proof.
Each person’s norms are constituted by the impressions that they have been exposed to and are, thereby, conditioned to continue bathing in. It seems to take a certain ‘critical mass’ of consistent impressions, some incremental (context) and some sudden (foreground), as in shock or mystic revelation to launch a particular way of seeing things into a particular supreme dominance, for good or for ill.
Even trauma, which includes shock, there is still the ‘all that has gone before it’ – been heard, experienced, feared, anticipated – that will have created the preconditions for the particular constitutive shock to be subjectively experienced and then to take root as unbearably and unforgivingly ‘Right’.
So, becoming ill takes consistent experiences oriented by focus on unwelcome perceptions. Equally, becoming well calls for its own critical mass of reaching for and finding what is desired.
Meditative practices, breathing, invocations, mantras, ROMBI puzzles or other forms of structured handplay, play per se, all allow respite from the dominance of an imposing unwanted object In psychoanalysis, we call this imposing, unwanted object Super Ego – it berates and scorns us and all that we cherish. This incessant experience of imposing, unwanted ideas (thoughts) has mortifying effects, mentally and, where critical mass is sufficient, symptoms present in material form too. Respite from this is necessary so that the creative force of life can take shape in forms that we can celebrate. It is the contours of the superego that fixate the forms that captivate us in chronic mourning.
Extending respite (pausing of attention to the disappointments of the super ego) through a moment by moment focus on something else, in appreciation, in wonder, in curiosity, in rest; in any case, (increasingly) towards things that excite subject’s desire, however banal – even window shopping, allows for the flow of life oriented by desire to resume.
The key is to cultivate our consistency of attention to those interests in whose value we have come to believe, based on our own preferences.
Belief holds a decisive role.
To the extent that belief supports desire, then that is the ideal basis for seemingly miraculous unfoldings.
To the extent that the force of belief contradicts desire, this will be the extent of compromise, tension and inhibition of desired outcomes and the lethal effects that flow from this. The source of desire is life itself and thereby its force is unceasing. Desire as we commonly experience it, taking on a myriad of forms is also unceasing.
Desire is the means by which we engage in the play of life, the means by which we can know what the next logical step is from our own unique vantage point, given the conditions and opportunities that we perceive in any given moment.
As perceive an obstacle in our way and cannot see another way through, desire’s unceasing assertion may take the form of aggressive display. When this is barred too, aggressive impulses may escalate to violent ones. This seems to be an unfolding of the natural order of life.
Betting on Desire.
Personal discovery of the materially creative force of desire in and of itself is vitalising. It is within what we currently think of as ordinary human capability. It is not technically difficult to access, and positive effects begin to flow very quickly, some on the same day. The only condition is our willingness to dip our toe in the waters of possibility; to simply give it a try; again and again and again. Our work, then, is in the ‘healing of the will’, ie, steadily easing out our unwillingness to take a risk with – to bet on – our desire.
Various authors and speakers have told us that, we get what we think about, whether we want it or not. It appears that the focus of our thought gives form and actualises the potential of our experience. From this perspective, confirmation bias is not an unfortunate accident in the human condition but an underpinning principle in the perceptual and material of our experience of the world.
We can harness this confirmation bias to work in our favour; taking our bearings from desire and bringing into being more of what we would creatively want for ourselves, for others, for our environment, whatever!
The decision is ours to make in each moment to moment, given where we are, in which direction we want to turn our attention.